Bronchitis Research - Pulmonary Disorders, Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention

Bronchitis Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Bronchitis, including details on pulmonary disorders, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, prevention.


Bronchitis Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Bronchitis

Books on Bronchitis

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol.

Mansbach J, Acholonu U, Clark S, Camargo CA

Department of Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, USA. jonathan.mansbach@childrens.harvard.edu

BACKGROUND: Multicenter studies are becoming more common, and variability in local institutional review board (IRB) assessments can be problematic. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the variability of IRB responses to a multicenter observational study of children presenting to emergency departments. METHODS: The authors collected the original IRB applications, subsequent correspondence, and a survey assessing submission timing and response and the nature of IRB queries. The study was conducted as part of the Emergency Medicine Network (http://www.emnet-usa.org). RESULTS: Of 37 sites initiating the IRB process, 34 (92%) participated in this IRB-approved study. Institutional review boards returned initial applications in a median of 19 days (IQR, 11-34 d), and 91% considered the protocol to be minimal risk. Of 34 submissions, 13 required no changes, 18 received conditional approvals, and 3 were deferred. The median time from initial submission to final approval was 42 days (IQR, 27-61 d). Seven sites did not participate in patient recruitment: two had institutional issues, one obtained IRB approval too late for participation, and four sites (12%) reported that IRB hurdles contributed to their lack of participation. Nonetheless, 68% of sites that recruited patients reported that the overall experience made them more likely to participate in future multicenter research. CONCLUSIONS: There was substantial variation in IRB assessment of a standard protocol in this study. The burden of the application process contributed to some investigators not participating, but the majority of investigators remain enthusiastic about multicenter research. A national IRB may streamline the review process and facilitate multicenter clinical research.

Published 2 April 2007 in Acad Emerg Med, 14(4): 377-80.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Bronchitis Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Bronchitis Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (November)
  Issue 2 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



Bronchitis Books

The Chronic Bronchitis and Emphysema Handbook

The Chronic Bronchitis and Emphysema Handbook